Current:Home > MarketsNorth Carolina voter ID trial rescheduled again for spring in federal court -Wealth Harmony Labs
North Carolina voter ID trial rescheduled again for spring in federal court
View
Date:2025-04-16 19:57:41
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A federal lawsuit filed over five years ago challenging North Carolina’s new photo voter identification mandate is now set to go to trial in the spring, with an outcome that could possibly affect what people must do to cast ballots this fall.
The U.S. District Court in Winston-Salem announced on Monday that Judge Loretta Biggs will convene the nonjury trial starting May 6 over the law, which was implemented just last fall.
While the state’s photo ID requirement remains in place for the March 5 primary elections, a spring or summer ruling after the trial by Biggs to strike down the law could threaten its use in the November general election in the nation’s ninth-largest state. North Carolina will have races for governor, attorney general and many other statewide races on the fall ballots. Courts, however, can be cautious about changing voting rules close to an election to avoid confusion.
The May date is about three months later than the date that lawyers for the state NAACP and several local chapters had requested several months ago. They sued over the 2018 law claiming it is marred by racial bias.
Attorneys for Republican legislative leaders defending the law had told Biggs in writing that the trial schedule sought by the NAACP groups was deficient. They also said it allowed no opportunity for the judge to dismiss the case on arguments before going to a formal trial.
Biggs held a hearing in November about the trial date and whether the State Board of Elections should be required to provide more public records to the plaintiffs about how voter ID has been implemented since last year. In a separate order Monday, Biggs sent the plaintiff’s request to a magistrate judge to recommend a decision to her. That recommendation can be challenged.
After a state Supreme Court ruling last April upholding the 2018 law as legal, the photo ID mandate was carried out in mostly municipal elections in September, October and November.
The trial date order doesn’t estimate how long the trial will last. But it sets aside three weeks after the trial for the sides to file more papers.
The federal lawsuit alleges that the ID law violates the Voting Rights Act by discriminating disproportionately against Black and Latino voters to comply with the requirement. Republican lawmakers disagree and say the law builds public confidence in elections. They also point in part to a broader array of exceptions for people lacking an ID to still cast ballots when compared to an earlier voter ID law.
Previous trial dates for 2021 and 2022 were postponed. Biggs delayed one start date while the U.S. Supreme Court weighed her earlier refusal to allow GOP lawmakers to intervene in the case and defend the law in court. The U.S. justices sided with the legislative leaders in June 2022.
Biggs lifted her stay on action in the case last summer a few months after the state Supreme Court determined the mandate comported with state constitution.
In late 2019, Biggs issued a preliminary injunction blocking the 2018 voter ID law, saying it was tainted by racial bias largely because a previous voter ID law approved by legislators in 2013 had been struck down on similar grounds. The 2013 law was implemented briefly in 2016.
But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed her decision, writing that Biggs had put so much emphasis on the past conduct of the General Assembly that “it was virtually impossible for it to pass a voter ID law that meets constitutional muster.”
veryGood! (8116)
Related
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- William Decker: Founder of Wealth Forge Institute
- NFL draft trade tracker: Full list of deals; Minnesota Vikings make two big moves
- Chris Pine Reveals His Favorite Meme of Himself
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- Robert Irwin, son of 'Crocodile Hunter', reveals snail species in Australia named for him
- Man, dog now missing after traveling on wooden homemade raft in Grand Canyon National Park
- Fleeing suspect fatally shot during gunfire exchange with police in northwest Indiana
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Antiwar protesters’ calls for divestment at universities put spotlight on how endowments are managed
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- What to expect from Bill Belichick on ESPN's 'The Pat McAfee Show' draft coverage
- Cincinnati Bengals DE Trey Hendrickson requests trade
- 5th person charged in killing of 2 Kansas moms, officials say
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Charges against Trump’s 2020 ‘fake electors’ are expected to deter a repeat this year
- Ashley Judd, #MeToo founders react to ruling overturning Harvey Weinstein’s conviction
- Charlie Woods fails to qualify for US Open in his first attempt, shooting a 9-over 81
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Caleb Williams' NFL contract details: How much will NFL draft's No. 1 pick earn?
Amendments to Missouri Constitution are on the line amid GOP infighting
Kim Kardashian joins VP Harris to discuss criminal justice reform
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Hurry! Everything at J. Crew Factory Is Now 50% Off, Including Their Chicest Linen Styles
GOP mulls next move after Kansas governor vetoes effort to help Texas in border security fight
Selena Gomez Addresses Rumors She's Selling Rare Beauty