Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Wealth Harmony Labs
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:39:57
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- Phillies 3B Alec Bohm becomes first NL player to commit to 2024 MLB Home Run Derby
- A US appeals court will review its prior order that returned banned books to shelves in Texas
- NHRA legend John Force walking with assistance after Traumatic Brain Injury from crash
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Laundry Day
- Shiloh Jolie-Pitt, Suri Cruise and More Celebrity Kids Changing Their Last Names
- Gov. Whitmer shuts down 2024 presidential talk but doesn’t hide her ambitions in timely book launch
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- The Bachelor's Sarah Herron Gives Birth to Twins One Year After Son's Death
Ranking
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Nightengale's Notebook: Twins' Carlos Correa finds peace after bizarre free agency saga
- Israel considers Hamas response to cease-fire proposal
- A green flag for clean power: NASCAR to unveil its first electric racecar
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- WWE NXT Heatwave 2024: Time, how to watch, match card and more
- LeBron James discusses son Bronny, new Lakers coach JJ Redick
- Mega Millions winning numbers for July 5 drawing: Jackpot now worth $181 million
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Michigan friends recount the extraordinary moment they rescued a choking raccoon
Delaware judge refuses to dismiss lawsuit in battle over estate of the late pop icon Prince
‘Not Caused by an Act of God’: In a Rare Court Action, an Oregon County Seeks to Hold Fossil Fuel Companies Accountable for Extreme Temperatures
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
WWE Money in the Bank 2024 results: Winners, highlights, analysis
Judy Belushi Pisano, actress and widow of John Belushi, dies at 73
NHRA legend John Force walking with assistance after Traumatic Brain Injury from crash